|
| Multivariate model projections onto conditions that differ from those under which the models were calibrated can result in uncertainty owing to response extrapolation. Therefore, interpretations of models transferred to conditions not analogous to those of model calibration must be done carefully to avoid misleading conclusions. A good practice when producing model transfers is to assess the degree of dissimilarity between calibration and transfer conditions. The mobility oriented parity (MOP) metric is a tool commonly used to quantify such dissimilarities. Our study elucidated the details of MOP, and expanded the interpretability of results when transfer conditions are not analogous to those of model calibration. We implemented a more detailed characterization of non-analogous conditions previously only identified as outside calibration ranges. In addition, we quantified the sensitivity of MOP to the density and position of reference conditions in environmental space, and explored the effect of sample size on MOP results. We show that detailed characterizations of non-analogous conditions can help to determine which variables are different between the two areas and how. This information can be used to understand causes of environmental dissimilarity and to identify variables that could be excluded from ecological niche modeling owing to extrapolation risks associated with them. Our results also show that dissimilarity values calculated in comparisons offer good indicators of how reliable interpretations can be in areas with conditions not analogous to those of reference. The tools developed and implemented in this study provide a useful, quantitatively efficient means of characterizing extrapolation uncertainty in model transfer studies, a best practice when using multivariate ecological niche models to make predictions about species’ distributions. Highlights An extended version of the mobility oriented parity metric helps identify variables for which risks of model extrapolations can be expected. Distinct MOP metrics used to characterize dissimilarity show comparable general patterns in transfer areas, despite differences in values. As MOP results are influenced by background sampling size, the definition of this sample should be aimed to appropriately characterize calibration areas. | |
|